ON JUNE 26th, after months of legal wrangling over Donald Trump’s executive orders banning travel from several Muslim-majority countries, the Supreme Court effectively put an end to the battle. Officially, the five-justice majority’s opinion in Trump v Hawaii, which upholds the third version of the travel ban, sends the matter back to lower courts to ask again whether Mr Trump’s policy violates a constitutional bar on religious discrimination. But it is unlikely that further scrutiny will yield a different result. The most recent proclamation, from September 2017, fulfilling the president’s campaign promise to keep Muslims out of America is consistent, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, with both immigration law and the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court traditionally defers to presidents in matters of immigration and national security, and Chief Justice Roberts left no doubt, early in his opinion, that nothing about Donald Trump changes that. The...Continue reading
from United States https://ift.tt/2yJtQTY
No comments:
Post a Comment